SU's Institutional Review Board strives to ensure that all research studies involving human subject participants
To accomplish this mission, the IRB will
To assist the IRB in achieving these goals, all SU affiliates conducting human subjects research must adhere to the policies outlined throughout this site. These policies will be reviewed regularly and updated as necessary to reflect best practices in the field.
The IRB seeks to create a collaborative relationship with the SU research community to ensure research with human subjects proceeds in accordance with legal requirements and the principles of Respect for Persons, Beneficence and Justice. Specifically, the IRB follows the ethical principles of the Belmont Report and codified in the Common Rule (Title 45, Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects), including Subparts B (re: pregnant women and neonates), C (re: prisoners), and D (re: children). In consultation with faculty members and University administrators, the SU IRB has also developed institutional policies and procedures to make sure proposed and ongoing human research complies with these laws and principles.
In addition to complying with Federal regulations on IRB composition, the SU IRB staff and members reflect the combined expertise needed to review the various types of research protocols submitted. Our non-scientific member and non-affiliated members help represent the views of non-researchers and the local community. IRB members are appointed for rotating, 1- to 3-year terms (depending on the needs of the Board) by the Provost after consultation with the IRB Chair and the IRB Administrator.