Tuesday, November 01, 2011
AACSB International is the premier accrediting body for business schools. Albers is one of 637 schools worldwide (41 countries) with AACSB accreditation, which amounts to less than 5% of the world’s business schools. For more information on AACSB, you can go to www.aacsb.edu.
Every five years, schools go through a process of reaffirming their accreditation. This is our year for reaffirmation.
Back in the summer we submitted a report on our programs and operations. That report was reviewed by a peer review team consisting of three current or former deans. Our team consists of Dean Ali Malekzadeh, from Kansas State, Dr. Rich Flaherty, former dean at UNLV, and Dr. Abol Jalilvand, former dean at Loyola of Chicago. This is a very experienced and respected team. If we can meet their expectations, we can meet any team’s expectations!
After reviewing our report and asking for additional information, the peer review team visited our campus October 30 to November 1. They met with advisory board members on Sunday, October 30th. Throughout the day on Monday, October 31st, they met with Albers faculty, staff, and students while also reviewing files and documents. Near the end of the day they began to draft their report. Tuesday morning, November 1st, they delivered their report and recommendation to President Sundborg and Provost Crawford.
The team report makes a recommendation on whether our accreditation should be extended for another five years. That recommendation will go to the AACSB Maintenance of Accreditation Committee (MAC). The MAC will meet in December and decide to accept the report or send it back to the peer review team for further consideration. If all goes well, the MAC accepts a recommendation to affirm accreditation and that gets forwarded to the AACSB Board of Directors for their approval shortly thereafter. Reaffirmation is then formally announced at the AACSB annual meeting in April.
Reaffirmation is not a fete accompli. About 30% of schools going up for reaffirmation are placed on continuing review, which means that reaffirmation is postponed for a year or two while they work to address areas where they may not be meeting AACSB expectations. For example, problems frequently occur with the Assurance of Learning (aka “assessment”) system or with faculty qualifications, such as when schools do not have enough research active faculty.
I think we put together a solid report, and did so within the mere 50 pages that AACSB allows. Of course, there is no limit to the number of appendices you can submit, so that ran 218 pages! :} Kudos go to Susan Weihrich and her two graduate assistants, Maria Klink and Zoey Wu, for producing our report.
From what I have heard, our faculty and staff did a great job of preparing themselves to meet with the team. I was not a part of the meetings – don’t want the dean in there influencing people’s answers – but several people said, “You would have been really proud of how we answered the team’s questions!” That was great to hear and I am sure it will be reflected in our report.
So far, so good, but check back later when the process is further along.